GRE写作：写作范文有用吗.docx

　GRE 写作：写作范例有用吗 gre 写作范例有用吗?今天小编给大家带来 GRE 写作范例有用吗，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

　GRE 写作：写作范例有用吗 对于写作，不一定是你例子背得多、反复地用例子来举证论点就能写出一篇好文章，最好还是要找一本国外的写作教材来进行参考，弄清楚国外写作的具体要求，像《经济学人》、《时代周刊》这上面的评述类的文章都可以拿来进行借鉴，多进行模仿和学习。

　在这里像各位同学推荐一本国外教材，北大引进进来的，叫做《分析性写作》，这本书在书店都是可以买到的，大家可以从里面学习如何论证自己的分论点，这些都写得比较详细。

　中国学生写作时喜欢写一些大词和长句，觉得句子长了文章也就会写得好，但 GRE 作文却不是这么回事，有可能你自以为自己写的很好，但是逻辑性是不严密的， 可能外国人就会觉得很啰嗦，没有什么实质性的内容，结果就会导致分数比较低。

　GRE 作文关键是要反复多练，要仔细地反复地研究 OG 上面的范文，因为只有 OG 上面的文章是经过 ETS 认证的，所以一定要把这些范文研究得分成透彻，达到滚瓜烂熟的程度，掌握它每一个评分标准的要求，研究好为什么会给这篇范文 6 分而给另一篇 3 分;另外，学生在做 GRE 阅读时可以通过模仿这些阅读文章来提高自己的写作水平。

　GRE 写作满分范文赏析 Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.?? Although?the?argument?stated?above?discusses?the?importance?of?safety?equipment?as?significant?part?of?avoiding?injury,?the?statistics?quoted?are?vague?and?inconclusive.??Simply?because?75?percent?of?the?people?involved?in?roller-skating?accidents?are?not?wearing?the?stated?equipment?does?not?automatically?implicate?the?lack?of?equipment?as?the?cause?of?injury.??The?term?"accidents"?may?imply?a?great?variety?of?injuries.??The?types?of?injuries?one?could?incur?by?not?wearing?the?types?of?equipment?stated?above?are?minor?head?injuries;?skin?abrasions?or?possibly?bone?fracture?of?a?select?few?areas?such?as?knees,?elbows,?hands,?etc.?(which?are?in?fact?most?vulnerable?to?this?sport);?and/or?in

　juries?due?to?practising?the?sport?during?low?light?times?of?the?day.??During?any?physically?demanding?activity?or?sport?people?are?subjected?to?a?wide?variety?of?injuries?which?cannot?be?avoided?with?protective?clothing?or light-reflective?materials.??These?injuries?include?inner?trauma?(e.g.,?heart-attack);?exhaustion;?strained?muscles,?ligaments,?or?tendons;?etc.??Perhaps?the?numbers?and?percentages?of?people?injured?during?roller-skating,?even?without?protective?equipment,?would?decrease?greatly?if?people?participating?in?the?sport?had?proper?training,?good?physical?health,?warm-up?properly?before?beginning?(stretching),?as?well?as?take?other?measures?to?prevent?possible?injury,?such?as?common-sense,?by?refraining?from?performing?the?activity?after?proper?lighting?has?ceased?and?knowing?your?personal?limitations?as?an?individual?and?athlete.??The?statistics?used?in?the?above?reasoning?are?lacking?in?proper?direction?considering?their?assertions?and?therefore?must?be?further?examined?and?modified?so?that?proper?conclusions?can?be?reached.?? Commentary?? This?adequate?response?targets?the?argument"s?vague?and?inconclusive?"statistics."??The?essay?identifies?and?critiques?the?illogical?reasoning?that?results?from?the?misguided?use?of?the?argument"s?statistics:?? --?that?non-use?of?equipment?may?be?"automatically"?assumed?to?be?the????cause?of?injury? --?that?"accidents"?may?refer?to?minor?injuries? --?that?injuries?may?result?from?other?causes?--?skating?in?the?dark,????failure?to?train?or?warm-up?properly,?failure?to?recognize?one"s????physical?limitations?? The?writer?competently?grasps?the?weaknesses?of?the?argument.??The?ideas?are?clear?and?connected,?but?the?response?lacks?transitional?phrases.??Development,?too,?is?only?adequate.?? Control?of?language?is?better?than?adequate.??The?writer?achieves?both?control?and?clarity?and?ably?conforms?to?the?conventions?of?written?English.??Overall,?though,?this?4?response?lacks?the?more?thorough?development?that?would?warrant?a?score?of?5. GRE 写作满分范文赏析 Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-

　dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.?? The?arguement?is?well?presented?and?supported,?but?not?completely?well?reasoned.??It?is?clear?and?concisely?written.??The?content?is?logically?and?smoothly?presented.??Statistics?cited?are?used?to?develop?support?for?the?recommendation,?that?roller?skaters?who?invest?in?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment?can?reduce?their?risk?of?severe,?accidental?injuries.??Examples?of?the?types?of?protective?equipment?are?described?for?the?reader.??Unfortunately,?the?author?of?the?argement?fails?to?note?that?merely?by?purchasing?gear?and?reflective?equipment?that?the?skater?will?be?protected.??This?is,?of?course,?falacious?if?the?skater?fails?to?use?the?equipment,?or?uses?it?incorrectly?or?inappropriately.??It?is?also?an?unnecessary?assumption?that?a?skater?need?purchase?high-quality?gear?for?the?same?degree?of? effectiveness?to?be?achieved.??The?argument?could?be?improved?by?taking?these?issues?into?consideration,?and?making?recommendations?for?education?and?safety?awareness?to?skaters.?? Commentary?? The?first?half?of?this?generally?well-written?but?limited?response?merely?describes?the?argument.??The?second?half?of?the?paper?identifies?two?assumptions?of?the?argument:?? --?that?people?who?purchase?protective?gear?will?use?the?gear?--?that?high-quality?gear?is?more?effective?than?other?gear?? These?points?are?sufficient?to?constitute?some?analysis?and?thus?warrant?a?score?of?3.??However,?neither?of?these?analytic?points?is?developed?sufficiently?to?merit?a?score?of?4.? GRE 写作：写作范例有用吗

推荐访问:写作 有用吗 GRE